From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the kernel-doc tree Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:00:11 -0700 Message-ID: <4BFDB60B.50106@oracle.com> References: <20100526115346.da5a02aa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4BFD42A6.6060206@oracle.com> <20100527025020.da0c1bb7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100526095606.beed820e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20100527090923.c17a7ed4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:24263 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751428Ab0E0Ag6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 20:36:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100527090923.c17a7ed4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Michal Marek , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matt mooney , Kirill Smelkov On 05/26/10 16:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Wed, 26 May 2010 09:56:06 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >>> The kernel-doc tree is a quilt series :-( >> >> Yes. and it's viewable without pulling/cloning. ;) > > Ah, I shouldn't reply to emails so late at night :-( > >>> You can, of course, see the above commit in the linux-next tree via >>> gitweb on kernel.org. >> >> Thanks. Michal, I droppped these 3 patches. Please keep them in the >> kbuild tree. > > If anything, the kernel-doc patches should be kept as they are much more > extensive. And the conflict was trivial. The kbuild patch was just > fixing a typo (tey -> they). uh oh. OK, thanks, I'll restore them. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***