From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (kvm
 tree related)
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 06:40:49 +0300
Message-ID: <4C563E41.8000407@redhat.com>
References: <20100726142725.fbc5d94e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100802103350.9b1b8ff2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4259 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752050Ab0HBDlB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 1 Aug 2010 23:41:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20100802103350.9b1b8ff2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>

  On 08/02/2010 03:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> From: Stephen Rothwell<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:25:12 +1000
>> Subject: [PATCH] kvm: u64's should be printed with %llx
> Ping?
>

Sorry.  Applied now, and will appear on next next.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.