linux-next tree addition request (viafb)

linux-next tree addition request (viafb)

[Florian Tobias Schandinat]

Hi Stephen,

can you please add

	git://github.com/schandinat/linux-2.6.git viafb-next

to linux-next.
It contains patches for viafb intended for 2.6.37. All patches that are 
currently there have been posted.


Thanks,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

Re: linux-next tree addition request (viafb)

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2051 bytes --]

Hi Florian,

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:28:18 +0200 Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> can you please add
> 
> 	git://github.com/schandinat/linux-2.6.git viafb-next
> 
> to linux-next.
> It contains patches for viafb intended for 2.6.37. All patches that are 
> currently there have been posted.

I will add this after 2.6.36-rc1 has been released.  Do you want to be
the sole contact for warnings/errors/problems?  Or should I add some
other email addresses as well?

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgment of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
	Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@canb.auug.org.au

Legal Stuff:
By participating in linux-next, your subsystem tree contributions are
public and will be included in the linux-next trees.  You may be sent
e-mail messages indicating errors or other issues when the
patches/commits from your subsystem tree are merged and tested in
linux-next.  These messages may also be cross-posted to the linux-next
mailing list, the linux-kernel mailing list, etc.  The linux-next tree
project and IBM (my employer) make no warranties regarding the linux-next
project, the testing procedures, the results, the e-mails, etc.  If you
don't agree to these ground rules, let me know and I'll remove your tree
from participation in linux-next.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: linux-next tree addition request (viafb)

[Florian Tobias Schandinat]

Hi Stephen,

Stephen Rothwell schrieb:
> Hi Florian,
> 
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:28:18 +0200 Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> wrote:
>> can you please add
>>
>> 	git://github.com/schandinat/linux-2.6.git viafb-next
>>
>> to linux-next.
>> It contains patches for viafb intended for 2.6.37. All patches that are 
>> currently there have been posted.
> 
> I will add this after 2.6.36-rc1 has been released.  Do you want to be
> the sole contact for warnings/errors/problems?  Or should I add some
> other email addresses as well?

Thanks. As probably no one else is interested being the sole contact should be fine.


Best regards,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

Re: linux-next tree addition request (viafb)

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1098 bytes --]

Hi Florian,

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 01:19:33 +0200 Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell schrieb:
> > 
> > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:28:18 +0200 Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> wrote:
> >> can you please add
> >>
> >> 	git://github.com/schandinat/linux-2.6.git viafb-next
> >>
> >> to linux-next.
> >> It contains patches for viafb intended for 2.6.37. All patches that are 
> >> currently there have been posted.
> > 
> > I will add this after 2.6.36-rc1 has been released.  Do you want to be
> > the sole contact for warnings/errors/problems?  Or should I add some
> > other email addresses as well?
> 
> Thanks. As probably no one else is interested being the sole contact should be fine.

OK, I came to add this tree this morning only to discover that I already
have a viafb tree owned by Jonathan.  I have called your new tree
"florian-viafb" for now but I wonder if Jonathan's tree is still relevant?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

Re: linux-next tree addition request (viafb)

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:32:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> OK, I came to add this tree this morning only to discover that I already
> have a viafb tree owned by Jonathan.  I have called your new tree
> "florian-viafb" for now but I wonder if Jonathan's tree is still relevant?

I have some viafb stuff I really need to get back to, but I'm happy to
merge it through Florian.  So it probably makes sense to drop my tree in
favor of his.

Thanks,

jon

Re: linux-next tree addition request (viafb)

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 756 bytes --]

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:39:32 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:32:24 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I came to add this tree this morning only to discover that I already
> > have a viafb tree owned by Jonathan.  I have called your new tree
> > "florian-viafb" for now but I wonder if Jonathan's tree is still relevant?
> 
> I have some viafb stuff I really need to get back to, but I'm happy to
> merge it through Florian.  So it probably makes sense to drop my tree in
> favor of his.

OK, so I will drop your tree and rename florian-viafb to viafb tomorrow.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]