From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (slab tree related)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:16:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C76AF8D.2030507@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008260938360.16331@router.home>
On 26.8.2010 17.41, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, David Rientjes wrote:
>
>> I'm really hoping that we can remove this hack soon when the percpu
>> allocator can handle these allocations on UP without any specialized slab
>> behavior.
>
> So do I. Here is a slightly less hacky version through using
> kmalloc_large instead:
Applied and queued to -next.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-26 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-24 2:07 linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (slab tree related) Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-24 17:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-24 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-24 18:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-24 18:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-25 8:18 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 8:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-25 13:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-26 8:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] vmalloc: pcpu_get/free_vm_areas() aren't needed on UP Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 17:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-03 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] percpu: reduce PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE to 32k Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 17:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-03 16:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] percpu: use percpu allocator on UP too Tejun Heo
2010-09-03 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-09-04 6:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-09-04 9:47 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-08 9:17 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-10 14:59 ` Tejun Heo
2010-09-18 17:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-09-03 16:27 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] vmalloc: pcpu_get/free_vm_areas() aren't needed on UP Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 20:12 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (slab tree related) Christoph Lameter
2010-08-25 21:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-25 0:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-08-25 4:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-08-25 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-26 0:01 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-26 1:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-26 3:16 ` David Rientjes
2010-08-26 14:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-08-26 18:16 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-08-14 7:53 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C76AF8D.2030507@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).