From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (slab tree related) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:16:45 +0300 Message-ID: <4C76AF8D.2030507@cs.helsinki.fi> References: <20100824120714.8918f8de.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4C740450.3030000@cs.helsinki.fi> <20100825101320.bed89b2a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4C74A01E.1060809@cs.helsinki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:50290 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752813Ab0HZSRD (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:17:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: David Rientjes , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo On 26.8.2010 17.41, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, David Rientjes wrote: > >> I'm really hoping that we can remove this hack soon when the percpu >> allocator can handle these allocations on UP without any specialized slab >> behavior. > > So do I. Here is a slightly less hacky version through using > kmalloc_large instead: Applied and queued to -next.