From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:14:58 -0700 Message-ID: <4C8F04D2.8020206@oracle.com> References: <20100907115426.fc0c3e13.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100907023404.GA11972@kroah.com> <20100913085155.6b73c9cc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <201009132126.14115.trenn@suse.de> <20100914143159.dca830f0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:35456 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751324Ab0INFRU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:17:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100914143159.dca830f0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Renninger , Greg KH , Jason Baron , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/13/10 21:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:26:13 +0200 Thomas Renninger wrote: >> >> On Monday 13 September 2010 17:51:55 Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >>>>> allnoconfig) produced this warning: >>>>> >>>>> kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args': >>>>> kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes >>>>> >>>>> Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic >>>>> Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a >>>>> 1024 byte array to the stack ... >>>> >>>> Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday? The patch was in that tree >>>> then, right? >>>> >>>> Thomas, care to fix this up? >>> >>> ping. Is Thomas around?? >> Yep, sorry for not responding. >> >> I tried to reproduce this on ppc64, but above file compiled without >> warning with dynamic debug set. Thus I thought this still came from the >> old patch. > > The report is for a powerpc allnoconfig build (see above) i.e. ppc32. It also happens on x86_32 (i386). -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***