From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: kexec load failure introduced by "x86, memblock: Replace e820_/_early string with memblock_" Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:56:24 -0700 Message-ID: <4C9EEE98.7020906@kernel.org> References: <637638372.1993021285484132309.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <637638372.1993021285484132309.JavaMail.root-k5qu2F3t005+R5eDjrG6zsCp5Q1pQRjfhaY/URYTgi6ny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kexec-bounces-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+glkk-kexec=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: CAI Qian Cc: linux-next , kexec , "H. Peter Anvin" List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 09/25/2010 11:55 PM, CAI Qian wrote: >> >> are you kexec from 2.6.35+ to 2.6.36-rc3+? > No, both kernels were the same version. I am sorry the above logs were misleading that were copy-and-pasted from different kernel versions. can you check tip instead of next tree? Yinghai