From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (tip tree related) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:00:17 -0700 Message-ID: <4CB35EC1.5040909@zytor.com> References: <20101011160429.81483d01.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4CB344C6.5040408@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:60067 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752037Ab0JKTCF (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:02:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CB344C6.5040408@kernel.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/2010 10:09 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > make all functions in memblock.c without __init to carry __init_memblock. > > > -static phys_addr_t __init memblock_find_region(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, > +static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_region(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, > phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align) > > -static int memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t addr) > +static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t addr) > Your patch description doesn't match what your patch does. Please write a correct description. -hpa