From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 22 (kvm) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:35:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4CF3D637.6060204@redhat.com> References: <20101122134911.b7e106f9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101122132627.bd4e88ef.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20101129083324.6870d7da.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101129083324.6870d7da.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Zachary Amsden , Glauber Costa Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 11/29/2010 06:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:26:27 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:49:11 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20101119: > > > > > > kvm.c:(.init.text+0x11f49): undefined reference to `kvm_register_clock' > > > > when CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK is not enabled. > > > BUild error still present in linux-next-2010-NOV-29. > Glauber, Zach? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function