From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Casey Schaufler Subject: Re: linux-next: unsigned commit ... Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:38:16 -0800 Message-ID: <4CF81FD8.3080208@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20101203092928.367d45c0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp110.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([98.136.44.55]:21887 "HELO smtp110.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752892Ab0LBWp1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101203092928.367d45c0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: James Morris , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Casey Schaufler The problem was in my converting to a git based submission process, not with the level of review, although I can see how the two would be indistinguishable. Thank you for the follow-up. On 12/2/2010 2:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi James, > > Commit 676dac4b1bee0469d6932f698aeb77e8489f5861 ("This patch adds a new > security attribute to Smack called") that was added to your tree today > has no Signed-off-by and could do with a better summary line in the > commit message. And probably a better explanation of what it does. > > Makes me wonder about the level of review it received :-( >