From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the  tree
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 08:15:23 +0100
Message-ID: <4D0C5F8B.2090704@kernel.org>
References: <20101217122831.39300d94.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1292597607.2820.17.camel@mulgrave.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:35562 "EHLO
	mail-bw0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751790Ab0LRHP1 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:15:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1292597607.2820.17.camel@mulgrave.site>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

Hello, James.

On 12/17/2010 03:53 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> Tejun, could you respin the sd patch on top of SCSI misc, please?  (I
> promise to review it speedily if you do).

Sure, will do later today.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun