From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: on builds/randconfigs Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:38:30 -0800 Message-ID: <4D2DF526.7090308@oracle.com> References: <20101213163607.0b0a7c3a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101213112033.d0060e6c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20110110090059.6f4d739d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <4D2DE97C.2000205@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:30975 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750970Ab1ALSiy (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:38:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Len Brown Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , akpm , Zhang Rui , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Zimny Lech On 01/12/11 10:35, Len Brown wrote: >>> While I agree that randconfig build testing >>> is theoretically useful, in recent memory >>> its results do not seem particularly relevant >>> to useful configs. >> >> Who defines useful? > > Simple. > > Configs that will be used are useful. Then I suggest that you start deleting non-useful kernel configs. You can begin in ACPI. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***