* memblock compile warnings
@ 2011-02-25 13:22 Heiko Carstens
2011-02-26 3:04 ` Yinghai Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Carstens @ 2011-02-25 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yinghai Lu, H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-next
Hi Yinghai,
your memblock code triggers generated these warnings on s390:
mm/page_alloc.c:3623:22: warning: 'last_active_region_index_in_nid' defined but not used
mm/page_alloc.c:3638:22: warning: 'previous_active_region_index_in_nid' defined but not used
please fix. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: memblock compile warnings
2011-02-25 13:22 memblock compile warnings Heiko Carstens
@ 2011-02-26 3:04 ` Yinghai Lu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2011-02-26 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Carstens; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, linux-next
On 02/25/2011 05:22 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> your memblock code triggers generated these warnings on s390:
>
> mm/page_alloc.c:3623:22: warning: 'last_active_region_index_in_nid' defined but not used
> mm/page_alloc.c:3638:22: warning: 'previous_active_region_index_in_nid' defined but not used
>
please check
[PATCH] mm: Move early_node_map[] reverse scan under HAVE_MEMBLOCK
Heiko found recent memblock change triggers generated these warnings on s390:
mm/page_alloc.c:3623:22: warning: 'last_active_region_index_in_nid' defined but not used
mm/page_alloc.c:3638:22: warning: 'previous_active_region_index_in_nid' defined but not used
Need to move those two function with find_memory_core_early(), the only user.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3616,34 +3616,6 @@ static int __meminit next_active_region_
return -1;
}
-/*
- * Basic iterator support. Return the last range of PFNs for a node
- * Note: nid == MAX_NUMNODES returns last region regardless of node
- */
-static int __meminit last_active_region_index_in_nid(int nid)
-{
- int i;
-
- for (i = nr_nodemap_entries - 1; i >= 0; i--)
- if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES || early_node_map[i].nid == nid)
- return i;
-
- return -1;
-}
-
-/*
- * Basic iterator support. Return the previous active range of PFNs for a node
- * Note: nid == MAX_NUMNODES returns next region regardless of node
- */
-static int __meminit previous_active_region_index_in_nid(int index, int nid)
-{
- for (index = index - 1; index >= 0; index--)
- if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES || early_node_map[index].nid == nid)
- return index;
-
- return -1;
-}
-
#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
/*
* Required by SPARSEMEM. Given a PFN, return what node the PFN is on.
@@ -3695,10 +3667,6 @@ bool __meminit early_pfn_in_nid(unsigned
for (i = first_active_region_index_in_nid(nid); i != -1; \
i = next_active_region_index_in_nid(i, nid))
-#define for_each_active_range_index_in_nid_reverse(i, nid) \
- for (i = last_active_region_index_in_nid(nid); i != -1; \
- i = previous_active_region_index_in_nid(i, nid))
-
/**
* free_bootmem_with_active_regions - Call free_bootmem_node for each active range
* @nid: The node to free memory on. If MAX_NUMNODES, all nodes are freed.
@@ -3731,6 +3699,38 @@ void __init free_bootmem_with_active_reg
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
+/*
+ * Basic iterator support. Return the last range of PFNs for a node
+ * Note: nid == MAX_NUMNODES returns last region regardless of node
+ */
+static int __meminit last_active_region_index_in_nid(int nid)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = nr_nodemap_entries - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES || early_node_map[i].nid == nid)
+ return i;
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Basic iterator support. Return the previous active range of PFNs for a node
+ * Note: nid == MAX_NUMNODES returns next region regardless of node
+ */
+static int __meminit previous_active_region_index_in_nid(int index, int nid)
+{
+ for (index = index - 1; index >= 0; index--)
+ if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES || early_node_map[index].nid == nid)
+ return index;
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+#define for_each_active_range_index_in_nid_reverse(i, nid) \
+ for (i = last_active_region_index_in_nid(nid); i != -1; \
+ i = previous_active_region_index_in_nid(i, nid))
+
u64 __init find_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align,
u64 goal, u64 limit)
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-26 3:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-25 13:22 memblock compile warnings Heiko Carstens
2011-02-26 3:04 ` Yinghai Lu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).