From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] staging/brcm80211: fix printk format warnings Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:08:36 -0800 Message-ID: <4D6FBD04.6090702@oracle.com> References: <20110301181119.f1c7a9c3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110301162948.34c28d6e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20110302210511.GA20798@kroah.com> <20110303103620.6b3c463f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110303072028.GA21427@sdf-MacBook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:40523 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751707Ab1CCQJM (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:09:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110303072028.GA21427@sdf-MacBook> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Greg KH , driverdevel , gregkh@suse.de, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On 03/02/11 23:20, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: >> Maybe due to conflict resolutions in my tree (assuming that Randy based >> his patch in linux-next). > We don't have brcm80211/sys/ directory (it was renamed to > brcm80211/brcmsmac); so it's based on the wrong/outdated tree. It was based on linux-next of 2011-0301, which is what the patch email was in reply to. > And I suppose these errors are already fixed. Good to know. Thanks. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***