From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:16:12 +0100 Message-ID: <4D74BE7C.4050701@kernel.dk> References: <20110307131958.84a5d818.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110307063618.GA10365@mtj.dyndns.org> <4D749A81.50809@kernel.dk> <20110307104747.GH20499@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:47166 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751895Ab1CGLQO (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2011 06:16:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Sedat Dilek , Tejun Heo , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2011-03-07 12:14, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On 3/7/11, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:41:23AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> $ git log -1 | cat >>> commit c45165cd2c77843f24ca18af54044303dc2a81ab >>> Author: Stephen Rothwell >>> Date: Mon Mar 7 17:38:41 2011 +1100 >>> >>> Add linux-next specific files for 20110307 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell >>> >>> $ git pull >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git >>> for-next >>> remote: Counting objects: 158, done. >>> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (89/89), done. >>> remote: Total 106 (delta 87), reused 21 (delta 17) >>> Receiving objects: 100% (106/106), 23.33 KiB, done. >>> Resolving deltas: 100% (87/87), completed with 34 local objects. >>> From git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block >>> * branch for-next -> FETCH_HEAD >>> warning: too many files (created: 1120 deleted: 637), skipping inexact >>> rename detection >>> warning: too many files (created: 974 deleted: 462), skipping inexact >>> rename detection >>> Auto-merging block/blk-core.c >>> Auto-merging block/blk-flush.c >>> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in block/blk-flush.c >>> Auto-merging block/cfq-iosched.c >>> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in block/cfq-iosched.c >>> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. >> >> Ummm... don't those conflicts come from Stephen's commits? You would >> need to revert the merge and fixup commits and then pull in the block >> branch. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> tejun >> > > I have reverted the merge-fix from Stephen "[PATCH] block: update for > __blk_run_queue() API update" which changed block/blk-flush.c, this > remains: > ... > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in block/cfq-iosched.c > > As it is 12p.m. and sun shining, my decision and direction is clear: > Lunch + City. Just checked here, I can pull my for-next cleanly into Linus' master. What is the block tree for-next branch sha? -- Jens Axboe