From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: "sedat.dilek@gmail.com" <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"dedekind1@gmail.com" <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:16:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D98F1DA.1060203@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimfCtqTA5aPYGRMZ1Ndz6eU8HnyJA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2011-04-02 13:02, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>> cc'ing Jens ...
>>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:22:41 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>>>>> Cc'ing Artem,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:55:52 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y set, I see in my build.log:
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> MODPOST 2742 modules
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> ERROR: "empty_aops" [fs/ubifs/ubifs.ko] undefined!
>>>>>>>> make[5]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
>>>>>>>> make[4]: *** [modules] Error 2
>>>>>>>> make[3]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>>>>>>>> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>>>>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>>>>>>>> `/home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.39-rc1/debian/build/build_i386_none_686-iniza'
>>>>>>>>
> [...]
>> Just FYI:
>> I contacted Jens last night and he refreshed his for-linus GIT branch.
>> Adding missing include <linux/fs.h> did not fix the issue.
>> I am trying with the attached one.
>>
>> - Sedat -
>>
>
> I have split the single patch into two, first reflects ther build-error.
> The second considers {inode,file}_operations have also undefined
> functions by using "unified" empty_{iops,fops} as used in other fs/*
> files.
What are these patches against? Not for-next nor my for-linus.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-03 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-01 18:22 linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s Sedat Dilek
2011-04-02 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-02 10:14 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-02 11:02 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-03 22:16 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-04-03 22:19 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-03 22:21 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-03 22:33 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-03 22:36 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-03 22:38 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-03 22:47 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-03 23:14 ` Sedat Dilek
2011-04-03 23:07 ` Sedat Dilek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D98F1DA.1060203@fusionio.com \
--to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@googlemail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox