From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when  CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:16:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4D98F1DA.1060203@fusionio.com>
References: <AANLkTimhD_cu46Bhtt9v8MjKMVCnVMT6Es+Ys9RNPOp1@mail.gmail.com>	<20110402112037.ca288d7b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>	<BANLkTim_y-=rU8r0_LKEMjPco6TXrEpBvw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimfCtqTA5aPYGRMZ1Ndz6eU8HnyJA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:59943 "EHLO kernel.dk"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751180Ab1DCWRO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:17:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimfCtqTA5aPYGRMZ1Ndz6eU8HnyJA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: "sedat.dilek@gmail.com" <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, "dedekind1@gmail.com" <dedekind1@gmail.com>, "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On 2011-04-02 13:02, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>> cc'ing Jens ...
>>>
>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:22:41 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 18:10 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>>>>> Cc'ing Artem,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:55:52 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y set, I see in my build.log:
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> MODPOST 2742 modules
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> ERROR: "empty_aops" [fs/ubifs/ubifs.ko] undefined!
>>>>>>>> make[5]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
>>>>>>>> make[4]: *** [modules] Error 2
>>>>>>>> make[3]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>>>>>>>> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>>>>> make[2]: Leaving directory
>>>>>>>> `/home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.39-rc1/debian/build/build_i386_none_686-iniza'
>>>>>>>>
> [...]
>> Just FYI:
>> I contacted Jens last night and he refreshed his for-linus GIT branch.
>> Adding missing include <linux/fs.h> did not fix the issue.
>> I am trying with the attached one.
>>
>> - Sedat -
>>
> 
> I have split the single patch into two, first reflects ther build-error.
> The second considers {inode,file}_operations have also undefined
> functions by using "unified" empty_{iops,fops} as used in other fs/*
> files.

What are these patches against? Not for-next nor my for-linus.

-- 
Jens Axboe