From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Ungerer Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' tree Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:19:22 +1000 Message-ID: <4DDD9C8A.3000104@snapgear.com> References: <20110525110424.0f3dbe85.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sncsmrelay2.nai.com ([67.97.80.206]:41150 "EHLO sncsmrelay2.nai.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757063Ab1EZAWi (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 20:22:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110525110424.0f3dbe85.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Ungerer Hi Stephen, On 25/05/11 11:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in > arch/m68k/kernel/m68k_ksyms.c between commit a697dc934f52 ("m68k: merge > non-mmu and mmu versions of m68k_ksyms.c") from Linus' tree and commit > e05f64c1bac9 ("m68k: merge non-mmu and mmu versions of m68k_ksyms.c") > from the m68knommu tree. > > Two (slightly different) versions of the same change I used the version > from the m68knommu tree as that was comitted later. Sorry, should be fixed now. (Though maybe I annoyed Andrew a little by including a couple of new patches in there as well :-( > P.S. Greg, do I need to change your contact address? No, you can use any of: gerg@snapgear.com gerg@uclinux.org I tend to signoff using the uclinux.org address, but primary email address is the snapgear.com one. Regards Greg -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888 8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323 Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com