From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bcma: needs export.h Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:43:18 -0700 Message-ID: <4E78FAE6.6080903@xenotime.net> References: <20110920173102.d38155c7defbbc29beaae7c0@canb.auug.org.au> <4E78CFC0.4020003@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.11]:39781 "HELO oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751096Ab1ITUnT (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:43:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" On 09/20/2011 11:45 AM, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: > 2011/9/20 Randy Dunlap : >> From: Randy Dunlap >> >> bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c needs to include , >> so add it to the headers that are included by bcma_private.h. >=20 > Please take a look at discussion in: > [PATCH -next] bcma: main.c needs to include > thread (by Andrew). >=20 > I believe that according to the discussion, such a includes should be > done in .c files. >=20 > Andrew: can you comment? Am I right? Sure, I'll resubmit the patch. Is there already a patch to remove from bcma_private.h = ? bcma_private.h uses __init & __exit, so it should #include ... --=20 ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your cod= e ***