From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the tree
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:22:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8B24BE.8060102@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111004175724.b253f03270f1067531e5d95d@canb.auug.org.au>
On 10/04/11 07:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the moduleh tree got a conflict in
> drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-ring.c between commit 14555b14455f
> ("staging:iio: replacing term ring with buffer in the IIO core") from the
> staging tree and commit 4903058fe223 ("staging: Add export.h for
> THIS_MODULE/EXPORT_SYMBOL to drivers/staging users") from the moduleh
> tree.
>
> The former renamed the file modified by the latter. The new file is
> drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c and will need to include
> export.h.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:48:56 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] staging: Add export.h for EXPORT_SYMBOL to
> drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Sorry Paul, I fear this going to keep happening. Is there
a minimal set of patches Greg could pull into staging-next
to avoid more similar issues?
(assuming it isn't already all sorted out!)
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 4ce101a..628aa69 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> * - Alternative access techniques?
> */
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/cdev.h>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-04 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-04 6:57 linux-next: manual merge of the moduleh tree with the tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-04 15:22 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2011-10-05 4:18 ` Paul Gortmaker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-25 8:45 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-26 19:57 ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-10-26 20:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-13 6:31 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-28 6:53 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-01 3:09 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E8B24BE.8060102@cam.ac.uk \
--to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).