From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@dsn.lapis-semi.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:22:06 +0900
Message-ID: <4E969FAE.5000909@dsn.lapis-semi.com>
References: <20111006144826.a69a5ea59d4ca94f8f7414cf@canb.auug.org.au> <20111011173714.d54bbcee6c0676ddcc37a1f3@canb.auug.org.au> <4E93EA10.4030405@dsn.lapis-semi.com> <20111012152451.66ce5ddffb4c5b3a4f6a31cf@canb.auug.org.au> <4E9525AC.9080909@dsn.lapis-semi.com> <CABMQnV+S2WbW0YZBiMXfs81b2dyLzj9wBxPmNuFrYErKfXsWtg@mail.gmail.com> <4E9551B8.4060601@dsn.lapis-semi.com> <20111013035714.GD15829@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp ([203.211.202.206]:26022 "EHLO
	sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752227Ab1JMIWL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Oct 2011 04:22:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20111013035714.GD15829@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

(2011/10/13 12:57), Grant Likely wrote:
> I've temporarily pushed out a commit that makes the pch and ml_ioh
> bool instead of tristate.  If that other patch gets acked by Thomas,
> then I should probably take it through the gpio tree.
Let me clarify your intention.
Does previous patch for generic-chip posted by Nobuhiro enable 
pch/ml_ioh gpio driver works on both module and built-in ?
If yes, why do you need to change tristate to bool ?

-- 
tomoya
ROHM Co., Ltd.