From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 3 (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:34:50 -0800 Message-ID: <4EB816BA.3030406@xenotime.net> References: <20111103172036.0795ce9559ab2dbfd5740a26@canb.auug.org.au> <4EB33525.808@xenotime.net> <4EB419F5.6070308@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Linus , Michal Marek , x86 maintainers , Sasha Levin , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 11/04/2011 01:03 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 11/03/2011 05:43 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 11/02/2011 11:20 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> When KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE is enabled but CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, there are >>> MANY build errors. This one (case) is probably fixed by adding "select BLOCK", but it's >>> all rather ugly. >> >> kconfig even tells us: >> >> warning: (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE) selects KGDB which has unmet direct dependencies (HAVE_ARCH_KGDB && DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERIMENTAL) >> warning: (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE) selects BLK_DEV which has unmet direct dependencies (BLOCK) > > Sasha, I guess your patch fixes this? Can you send me a version that > doesn't add the oldconfig magic that Ingo objected to? Here is more of the twisty maze (from linux-next 2011-1107): warning: (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE && AMD_IOMMU) selects PCI_MSI which has unmet direct dependencies (PCI && ARCH_SUPPORTS_MSI) warning: (KVMTOOL_TEST_ENABLE) selects KGDB which has unmet direct dependencies (HAVE_ARCH_KGDB && DEBUG_KERNEL && EXPERIMENTAL) -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***