From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: Please add my tree to linux-next Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:52:50 +0800 Message-ID: <4EDC6A42.1090806@redhat.com> References: <4ED8529E.5070608@redhat.com> <20111205100930.1bedc458a5e78b85c563465d@canb.auug.org.au> <4EDC594D.5040008@redhat.com> <20111205171207.3b3bc1ad6d99ad7d7c9c0792@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41337 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751398Ab1LEGxF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 01:53:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111205171207.3b3bc1ad6d99ad7d7c9c0792@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML =E4=BA=8E 2011=E5=B9=B412=E6=9C=8805=E6=97=A5 14:12, Stephen Rothwell =E5= =86=99=E9=81=93: > Hi, > On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:40:29 +0800 Cong Wang wrot= e: >> >>> * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contribu= tor's >>> Signed-off-by, >> >> When I sent the patches out, they all have my Signed-off-by, but not= in the >> commit logs in my tree. Is this a problem? > > Yes, you must have a signed-off-by line for each person who handles t= he > patches (in this case just you, since you are also the author). > Linus (in theory) would not merge your tree if you asked him to if it > lacked signed-off-by lines (and I will have to drop it if they are no= t > added - this will mean rebasing your tree, of course). > Ok, I will re-commit those patches with my S-o-b and rebase my tree. Thanks!