From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Seth Jennings Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fix powerpc linux-next break on zsmalloc Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:25:17 -0600 Message-ID: <4F3A6ECD.7030504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1329144469-8575-1-git-send-email-sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F3A43EC.2030209@gmx.de> <4F3A480C.9090407@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F3A480C.9090407@gmx.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Marc Dietrich Cc: Greg KH , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 02/14/2012 05:39 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote: > Am 14.02.2012 12:22, schrieb Marc Dietrich: >> Am 13.02.2012 15:47, schrieb Seth Jennings: >>> linux/vmalloc.h added to zsmalloc-main.c to resolve implicit >>> declaration errors. >>> >>> X86 dependency added to zsmalloc and dependent drivers zcache and zram. >>> >>> This X86 only requirement is not ideal. Working to find portable >>> functions for __flush_tlb_one and set_pte. >> >> sorry, zcache/zram works fine one ARM here. Why not depend on !POWERPC? > > ups, sorry again, I tested an older version only. flush_tlb_one and > set_pte is only used with the new allocator as it seems. Hey Marc, I haven't forgotten about you. I know that zcache (and therefore) zsmalloc must work on ARM to be viable since there are known ARM users. When we have a solution, I'll be contacting you to test it on ARM :) -- Seth