linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Rob Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpuidle-cons tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:05:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5E1ECC.1040605@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120309183732.512d3676599da324f4747219@canb.auug.org.au>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/09/2012 08:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi Rob,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the cpuidle-cons tree got a conflict
> in arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c between commit 00482a4078f4 ("ARM:
> at91: implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle") from the
> arm-soc tree and commit 7a1f6e72dce1 ("ARM: at91: Consolidate time
> keeping and irq enable") from the cpuidle-cons tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

Yes: resolution correct. Please carry it.

Thanks to Rob and Daniel for their answers.

Best regards,
- -- 
Nicolas Ferre
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPXh7HAAoJEAf03oE53VmQSQwH/15D3okPxJSEiH0k8IFt6Df0
RDY/CdaGYDllGMq7Yc1LiQAPrlHkv+gFNAJkhH8aJvC603pYBFGIa5IPLeZEE+XD
MkXiO7pQAOdGtojqSrZI8Sp0kxtfdR6QlNu5o518yvlKIkxbWJoXdVty9+MuciOv
GOR+164hJtlr4fLLg7bTzsdnxquDVBBbks9qLhSYEQBEuNkgXKgNfdMouwVI/Zuj
sX9DSKnVVm5LS/rrq888JRPPtBf8/HkmOeFRWKktq7Q8WldQbBI79vj01osH++jf
rwDiM/CSC0nhXY0IWEof+Hz1mSinM07XGZglDYwqI1ca7HId2C/txaFI3NtcC7A=
=rZpG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-12 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-09  7:37 linux-next: manual merge of the cpuidle-cons tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-09 22:26 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-09 22:45   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-03-12 16:05 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2012-03-12 17:03   ` Rob Lee
2012-03-12 23:06     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13  1:50       ` Rob Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F5E1ECC.1040605@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rob.lee@linaro.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).