From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:22:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6C9547.4060509@pobox.com> References: <20120323130031.c097ca3755de5ff5879504e1@canb.auug.org.au> <1332478202.2882.2.camel@pasglop> <1332490486.2801.1.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <1332492832.2882.4.camel@pasglop> <1332493291.2801.14.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:51245 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755321Ab2CWPWu (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:22:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1332493291.2801.14.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: James Bottomley Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan On 03/23/2012 05:01 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > Yes, sorry ... it's one of those large all or nothing type series that > touches about 33 different drivers (about 75% of which are > unmaintained). To be more specific, it was a patch series that was never CC'd to ANY driver author, nor linux-ide, nor LKML. Jeff