linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Mackey <tdmackey@twitter.com>,
	Vinson Lee <vlee@twitter.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 07:29:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBB6A99.4040503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1205221055340.16396@pobox.suse.cz>

Em 22-05-2012 05:55, Jiri Kosina escreveu:
> On Fri, 18 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the edac tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/edac/edac_core.h between commit 15ed103a9800 ("edac: Fix spelling
>> errors") from the trivial tree and commit 90b40d5cadba ("edac: Remove the
>> legacy EDAC ABI") from the edac tree.
>>
>> One of the comments fixed by the former is removed by the latter, so I
>> did that.
> 
> On Fri, 18 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the edac tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/edac/edac_device.c between commit 15ed103a9800 ("edac: Fix
>> spelling errors") from the trivial tree and commit b9e889c84229 ("edac:
>> rewrite edac_align_ptr()") from the edac tree.
>>
>> One of the comments fixed by the former is removed by the latter, so I
>> did that.
> 
> I have dropped both hunks, so the conflict should be gone. Thanks.

Thanks!
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-22 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18  6:06 linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-22  8:55 ` Jiri Kosina
2012-05-22 10:29   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-18  6:02 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FBB6A99.4040503@redhat.com \
    --to=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tdmackey@twitter.com \
    --cc=vlee@twitter.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).