From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 07:29:45 -0300 Message-ID: <4FBB6A99.4040503@redhat.com> References: <20120518160603.0eddece830f829d3b8570ac7@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Mackey , Vinson Lee List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Em 22-05-2012 05:55, Jiri Kosina escreveu: > On Fri, 18 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi Mauro, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the edac tree got a conflict in >> drivers/edac/edac_core.h between commit 15ed103a9800 ("edac: Fix spelling >> errors") from the trivial tree and commit 90b40d5cadba ("edac: Remove the >> legacy EDAC ABI") from the edac tree. >> >> One of the comments fixed by the former is removed by the latter, so I >> did that. > > On Fri, 18 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi Mauro, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the edac tree got a conflict in >> drivers/edac/edac_device.c between commit 15ed103a9800 ("edac: Fix >> spelling errors") from the trivial tree and commit b9e889c84229 ("edac: >> rewrite edac_align_ptr()") from the edac tree. >> >> One of the comments fixed by the former is removed by the latter, so I >> did that. > > I have dropped both hunks, so the conflict should be gone. Thanks. Thanks! Mauro