From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Zankel Subject: Re: Resurrecting linux-next tree for Xtensa Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:04:23 -0700 Message-ID: <502441F7.2060208@zankel.net> References: <50232D57.4000205@zankel.net> <20120810085312.bb2f1df59f6f4dfdca965de1@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:61067 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759926Ab2HIXEZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 19:04:25 -0400 Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so1638754pbb.19 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:04:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120810085312.bb2f1df59f6f4dfdca965de1@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov Hi Stephen, On 08/09/2012 03:53 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Chris. > > On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 20:24:07 -0700 Chris Zankel wrote: >> I was wondering and hoping you could add the Xtensa 'next' tree back to >> the linux-next tree? >> >> It's currently on github (at least, until I get my access back to >> kernel.org) > You will need to get a gpg key signed so that you can move this tree to > kernel.org or to signed tags when you ask Linus to pull your tree. Working on it... >> git://github.com/czankel/xtensa-linux.git#for-next > ^ > I used "for_next". Just to be sure, that branch is currently empty, > right? Correct. Patches should be popping up in a few days... >> It's been outdated for some time now and with more help we want to bring >> it up-to-date again. > Sounds like a good plan! > > Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As I appreciate all the time and effort you put into the linux-next tree! Thanks so much! Cheers! -Chris