From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:43:06 +0200 Message-ID: <50B460FA.1080603@mellanox.com> References: <20121127114751.6961da02245ed6851190aca2@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121127114751.6961da02245ed6851190aca2@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings , Amir Vadai List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 27/11/2012 02:47, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c between commit 08ff32352d6f > ("mlx4: 64-byte CQE/EQE support") from the infiniband tree and commit > f1d29a3fa68b ("mlx4_en: Remove remnants of LRO support") from the > net-next tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). > Acked-by: Or Geritz