From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:03:23 -0700 Message-ID: <517EE01B.80109@infradead.org> References: <20130429191754.8ee71fb814790bf345516ab8@canb.auug.org.au> <517ED2A6.5030200@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <517ED2A6.5030200@infradead.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux MM List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 04/29/13 13:05, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130426: >> > > > (who is responsible for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY?) > > > on x86_64: > > warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU) > > because MEM_SOFT_DIRTY selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled. > > > Can MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on PROC_FS? > > and the help text for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY refers to Documentation/vm/soft-dirty.txt, > which does not exist. Please add the file. Oops, sorry, I looked in the wrong place for that file, which DOES exist. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org