linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the  tree
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:04:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <527C2AA9.9040608@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131107192545.GA20624@moria.home.lan>

On 11/07/2013 01:25 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:20:26PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:

>> I ended up replacing a call to bio_iovec_idx() with __bvec_iter_bvec()
>> since the former was removed. It's not very elegant, but it works. I'm
>> open to suggestions on a cleaner fix, but it can wait until one or both
>> of these trees is merged.
> 
> No, that's definitely wrong. Read Documentation/block/biovecs.txt - you
> need to use either the new bio_iovec() or bio_iovec() iter. I can do the
> conversion later today.

Stephen,
Can you please drop the aio-direct tree for the time being?

My stuff is not aligning very well with the immutable biovecs and Kent
has a different approach in mind. I'll be working with him on a
replacement that will hopefully be simpler.

Thanks,
Shaggy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-08  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-01  3:20 linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-01 15:10 ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-01 20:22   ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-01 20:27     ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-01 20:41       ` Dave Kleikamp
2013-11-01 20:53         ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-01 21:07           ` Dave Kleikamp
2013-11-02 20:50           ` Dave Kleikamp
2013-11-07 19:17             ` Olof Johansson
2013-11-07 19:20               ` Kent Overstreet
2013-11-07 19:20             ` Dave Kleikamp
2013-11-07 19:25               ` Kent Overstreet
2013-11-07 19:38                 ` Dave Kleikamp
2013-11-08  0:04                 ` Dave Kleikamp [this message]
2013-11-08  1:53                   ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  2:08                     ` Kent Overstreet
2013-11-08  2:32                       ` Dave Kleikamp
2013-11-08  7:33                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-08  7:39                           ` Kent Overstreet
2013-11-08  7:44                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-08  7:56                               ` Kent Overstreet
2013-11-08  8:02                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-08  8:17                                   ` Kent Overstreet
2013-11-08  8:32                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-11-08  9:21                                       ` Kent Overstreet
2013-11-08 17:56                                         ` Zach Brown
2013-11-08 15:10                           ` Dave Kleikamp
2013-11-08 15:29                           ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-08 16:15                             ` Jens Axboe
2013-11-10 21:32                               ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  2:39                     ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-17  1:28 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-17 14:53 ` James Bottomley
2010-12-18  7:15   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-10  4:48 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-10  7:24 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-10  7:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-10  7:43     ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-01  5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01  6:59 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-18  4:53 Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-18  6:27 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-18 12:34   ` Rusty Russell
2009-05-18 12:42     ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-19  0:11       ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=527C2AA9.9040608@oracle.com \
    --to=dave.kleikamp@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=zab@zabbo.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).