From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:59:48 +0100 Message-ID: <52E57744.5030807@gmail.com> References: <20140113160630.cf720268510f5e0931c24284@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140113160630.cf720268510f5e0931c24284@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell , Mike Turquette , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Kukjin Kim Cc: Andrzej Hajda , Tomasz Figa , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On 13.01.2014 06:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got a conflict in > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c between commit 86576fbe201b ("clk: > samsung: exynos4: Fix definition of div_mmc_pre4 divider") from the > arm-soc tree and commit 2d7382375054 ("clk: exynos4: replace clock ID > private enums with IDs from DT header") from the clk tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). It seems like somehow this fix-up has been lost in action and the conflict ended up being merged incorrectly in linux-next. Could you take a look? Best regards, Tomasz