From: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
llvmlinux@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the llvmlinux tree with the tree
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:24:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5416F69C.8040905@converseincode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140915163813.490886b4@canb.auug.org.au>
On 09/14/14 23:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the llvmlinux tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/hdmi/hdmi.c between commit fc886107c556 ("drm/msm:
> Change nested function to static function") from the watchdog tree and
> commit 8f2c494adad0 ("msm, hdmi: LLVMLinux: Remove nested function from
> HDMI driver") from the llvmlinux tree.
>
> I fixed it up (these patches are doing the same thing, so I used the
> version in the watchdog tree) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action is required).
>
> P.S. Behan, I noticed that the llvmlinux patch has no Signed-off-by
> from you even though you committed it ...
Drat. That patch wasn't supposed to be in there. Sorry about that.
Yeah. That one was accepted upstream already. I was carrying it in my
repos so we could still build until it made it to mainline. I should not
have put that in linux-next. I actually just had to pull it out of my
own builds due to the same merge issue.
Hmm. Seems I put a couple of patches into the for-next branch late last
night which shouldn't have been. Fixed.
Apologies,
Behan
--
Behan Webster
behanw@converseincode.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-15 6:38 linux-next: manual merge of the llvmlinux tree with the tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-15 14:24 ` Behan Webster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5416F69C.8040905@converseincode.com \
--to=behanw@converseincode.com \
--cc=charlebm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvmlinux@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).