From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 06:32:33 -0700 Message-ID: <54256AF1.6030800@roeck-us.net> References: <20140925202559.GA1750@roeck-us.net> <20140926075859.GA21697@chokladfabriken.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:42674 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755052AbaIZNcv (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:32:51 -0400 Received: from mailnull by bh-25.webhostbox.net with sa-checked (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XXVdi-0018Ms-7o for linux-next@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:32:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20140926075859.GA21697@chokladfabriken.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stefan Kristiansson , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Ulf Hansson , Vineet Gupta , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-Next , linux , Eric Paris On 09/26/2014 12:59 AM, Stefan Kristiansson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:30:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> Hi G=FCnther, >> >> [cc openrisc] >> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Guenter Roeck = wrote: >>> New build failures: >> >>> openrisc-defconfig >>> >>> In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0: >>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arc= h': >>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' un= declared >> >> That's not a new one. It's been failing for half or year or so. >> >> If you only see it now, that means something else got fixed ;-) >> > >>>From what I can see, it's caused by > ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches= ") > that got (re?)introduced two days ago. > > To me it seems that the problem is that EM_OPENRISC is > missing in include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h, but if that's the case, > I think microblaze have the same problem with that patch applied. > Microblaze builds for some reason. But, yes, that commit is from March. Maybe that is where I remember it from. You are right, it builds if I add the define. I'll submit a patch to fi= x the problem if the resulting image builds. Guenter