linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree

linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree

[Guenter Roeck]

Build results:
	total: 133 pass: 115 fail: 18
Failed builds:
	alpha:defconfig
	alpha:allmodconfig
	arc:defconfig
	i386:allyesconfig
	i386:allmodconfig
	m68k:allmodconfig
	mips:allmodconfig
	openrisc:defconfig
	powerpc:cell_defconfig
	powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
	powerpc:mpc85xx_defconfig
	powerpc:mpc85xx_smp_defconfig
	powerpc:cell_defconfig
	powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
	powerpc:mpc85xx_defconfig
	powerpc:mpc85xx_smp_defconfig
	tile:tilegx_defconfig
	xtensa:allmodconfig

---

New build failures:

---
arc:defconfig

arch/arc/kernel/setup.c: In function 'customize_machine':
arch/arc/kernel/setup.c:354: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_clk_init'

---
mips:allmodconfig

arch/mips/net/bpf_jit.c: In function 'build_body':
arch/mips/net/bpf_jit.c:762:6: error: unused variable 'tmp' [-Werror=unused-variable]

---
openrisc-defconfig

In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared

---
tile:defconfig

In file included from sound/pci/cs46xx/dsp_spos.c:25:0:
include/linux/pm.h: In function ‘dev_pm_domain_attach’:
include/linux/pm.h:631:10: error: ‘ENODEV’ undeclared
make[3]: *** [sound/pci/cs46xx/dsp_spos.o] Error 1

---

Guenter

Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree

[Vineet Gupta]

Hi,

On Friday 26 September 2014 01:56 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> arc:defconfig
>
> arch/arc/kernel/setup.c: In function 'customize_machine':
> arch/arc/kernel/setup.c:354: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_clk_init'

This is now fixed/pushed.

Thx,
-Vineet

Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Günther,

[cc openrisc]

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> New build failures:

> openrisc-defconfig
>
> In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared

That's not a new one. It's been failing for half or year or so.

If you only see it now, that means something else got fixed ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
Linux mailing list
Linux@lists.openrisc.net
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/linux

Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree

[Guenter Roeck]

On 09/25/2014 11:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Günther,
>
> [cc openrisc]
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> New build failures:
>
>> openrisc-defconfig
>>
>> In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
>
> That's not a new one. It's been failing for half or year or so.
>
Thought I had seen it before.

> If you only see it now, that means something else got fixed ;-)
>
That's one way to put it ;-)

Guenter

Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree

[Stefan Kristiansson]

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:30:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Günther,
> 
> [cc openrisc]
> 
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > New build failures:
> 
> > openrisc-defconfig
> >
> > In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
> 
> That's not a new one. It's been failing for half or year or so.
> 
> If you only see it now, that means something else got fixed ;-)
> 

>From what I can see, it's caused by
ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches")
that got (re?)introduced two days ago.

To me it seems that the problem is that EM_OPENRISC is
missing in include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h, but if that's the case,
I think microblaze have the same problem with that patch applied.

Stefan

Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree

[Guenter Roeck]

On 09/26/2014 12:59 AM, Stefan Kristiansson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:30:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Günther,
>>
>> [cc openrisc]
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>> New build failures:
>>
>>> openrisc-defconfig
>>>
>>> In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
>>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
>>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
>>
>> That's not a new one. It's been failing for half or year or so.
>>
>> If you only see it now, that means something else got fixed ;-)
>>
>
>>From what I can see, it's caused by
> ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches")
> that got (re?)introduced two days ago.
>
> To me it seems that the problem is that EM_OPENRISC is
> missing in include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h, but if that's the case,
> I think microblaze have the same problem with that patch applied.
>

Microblaze builds for some reason. But, yes, that commit is from March.
Maybe that is where I remember it from.

You are right, it builds if I add the define. I'll submit a patch to fix
the problem if the resulting image builds.

Guenter

Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree

[Eric Paris]

On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 06:32 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 12:59 AM, Stefan Kristiansson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:30:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hi Günther,
> >>
> >> [cc openrisc]
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >>> New build failures:
> >>
> >>> openrisc-defconfig
> >>>
> >>> In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
> >>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> >>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
> >>
> >> That's not a new one. It's been failing for half or year or so.
> >>
> >> If you only see it now, that means something else got fixed ;-)
> >>
> >
> >>From what I can see, it's caused by
> > ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches")
> > that got (re?)introduced two days ago.
> >
> > To me it seems that the problem is that EM_OPENRISC is
> > missing in include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h, but if that's the case,
> > I think microblaze have the same problem with that patch applied.
> >
> 
> Microblaze builds for some reason. But, yes, that commit is from March.
> Maybe that is where I remember it from.
> 
> You are right, it builds if I add the define. I'll submit a patch to fix
> the problem if the resulting image builds.
> 
> Guenter

I had no idea you were having build problems for so long!!  I'm so
sorry!  The tree got pulled from -next for a while because we ran into
some arm problems and I was going on vacation.  So I pulled from -next.
It just went back into -next (after I dealt with arm).  And so you saw
build failure again on the 25th.

I guess the choices are moving EM_OPENRISC public like the other ones
(which I believe you sent a patch for) or maybe you can include
arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h inside
arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h so you still get to keep that
definition 'private'.  I have no idea if such an include would give you
a circular mess.  That happens all to often at the arch level.