From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
Roberto Medina <robertoxmed@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, josh@joshtripplet.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: octeon: ethernet-tx: fixed coding style warnings, missing blank lines
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:57:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5435A545.9040402@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141008205242.GA4606@drone.musicnaut.iki.fi>
On 14-10-08 04:52 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:46:55PM +0200, Roberto Medina wrote:
>> Thank you very much for your feedback. I just want to let you know that I
>> didn't ignore that annotation from the last patch. I actually added the
>> white line because checkpatch shows a warning there.
>>
>> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
>> #553: FILE: drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c:553:
>> + cvmx_wqe_t *work = cvmx_fpa_alloc(CVMX_FPA_WQE_POOL);
>> + if (unlikely(work == NULL)) {
>>
>> I don't see why I shouldn't insert a line there.
>
> Maybe something like this would be more readable:
>
> void *copy_location;
> + cvmx_wqe_t *work;
>
> /* Get a work queue entry */
> - cvmx_wqe_t *work = cvmx_fpa_alloc(CVMX_FPA_WQE_POOL);
> + work = cvmx_fpa_alloc(CVMX_FPA_WQE_POOL);
> if (unlikely(work == NULL)) {
>
> Then declarations would be correctly separated from the code...
It probably wouldn't hurt -- what I failed to notice when giving
it a quick scan was that it was a clunky typedef in use to create
the variable declaration vs. a sane "struct blah_work *work = ...."
so yes, checkpatch was right in this case.
Paul.
--
>
> A.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-08 19:18 [PATCH v2] Staging: octeon: ethernet-tx: fixed coding style warnings, missing blank lines Roberto Medina
2014-10-08 19:39 ` Paul Gortmaker
2014-10-08 19:46 ` Roberto Medina
2014-10-08 20:52 ` Aaro Koskinen
2014-10-08 20:57 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5435A545.9040402@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=josh@joshtripplet.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robertoxmed@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).