From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:16:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5484C3B9.2030909@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5484BF4D.1020809@de.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1516 bytes --]
Am 07.12.2014 um 21:57 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> Am 05.12.2014 um 11:32 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> After merging the access_once tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:189:0,
>> from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1,
>> from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
>> from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
>> from include/linux/fdtable.h:8,
>> from security/apparmor/domain.c:16:
>> include/linux/types.h:14:9: error: unknown type name '__kernel_fd_set'
>> typedef __kernel_fd_set fd_set;
>> ^
>>
>> And many more :-(
>>
>> Presumably caused by commit b06f66134856 ("kernel: Provide READ_ONCE
>> and ASSIGN_ONCE") which added types.h into compiler.h, but I am not
>> sure. It could be an interaction with something else in linux-next, of
>> course.
>>
>> I have dropped the access_once tree for today, sorry.
>>
>
> Interesting, I double checked with defconfig and cross compilation. But yes, using allmodconfig fails.
> I have changed that to uapi/linux/types.h and __u<xx>. This seems to fix it as it only adds a small set of types.
>
> Can you re-add?
>
> Christian
>
I also did an additional check and merged this tree with linux-next/master. This introduced a new problem.
The fix is simple, see patch. But I am not sure how to add that to next (via my tree), since this change is only in next.
Christian
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-x86-xen-p2m-Replace-ACCESS_ONCE-with-READ_ONCE.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1113 bytes --]
>From ef62db716c9edb1343c00eae45ad8f6c0c1c9255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 22:01:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen/p2m: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
Change the p2m code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/xen/p2m.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
index 8b5db51..08ddf91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ static bool alloc_p2m(unsigned long pfn)
mid_mfn = NULL;
}
- p2m_pfn = pte_pfn(ACCESS_ONCE(*ptep));
+ p2m_pfn = pte_pfn(READ_ONCE(*ptep));
if (p2m_pfn == PFN_DOWN(__pa(p2m_identity)) ||
p2m_pfn == PFN_DOWN(__pa(p2m_missing))) {
/* p2m leaf page is missing */
--
1.8.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-07 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 10:32 linux-next: build failure after merge of the access_once tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-07 20:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-07 21:16 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2014-12-07 23:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-08 11:26 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-08 11:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-09 19:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-10 8:20 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-10 11:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5484C3B9.2030909@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).