From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:39:12 +0100
Message-ID: <54C8A030.1000906@redhat.com>
References: <20150128120214.3307aed8@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48746 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1761245AbbA1Uu2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:50:28 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20150128120214.3307aed8@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>

On 01/28/2015 02:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
...
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Looks good, thanks!