From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9 (build failures) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:14:22 -0800 Message-ID: <54D9F61E.6040206@roeck-us.net> References: <20150209211827.652dc2ce@canb.auug.org.au> <20150209172048.GA27107@roeck-us.net> <54D9AE2C.5080403@rempel-privat.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D9AE2C.5080403@rempel-privat.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Oleksij Rempel , Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kenneth Westfield , Mark Brown , Daniel Lezcano List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 02/09/2015 11:07 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> >> Building sparc64:allmodconfig ... failed >> -------------- >> Error log: >> asm9260_timer.c:(.init.text+0x60d4): undefined reference to `of_io_request_and_map' > > The patch for this issue was send for two weeks: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/31/21 > > Should i resend it? > That might be a good idea. I would suggest to drop the "ARM" tag from the headline, and make sure the clocksource maintainers are copied. Also, add an empty line before "Reported-by:" and Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter