From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc and at91 trees Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 09:45:56 +0200 Message-ID: <555C3BB4.2000802@atmel.com> References: <20150520102743.3d336a73@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:44459 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751077AbbETHqz (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2015 03:46:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150520102743.3d336a73@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Kukjin Kim , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni , Ard Biesheuvel , Geert Uytterhoeven , Masahiro Yamada , Lee Jones , Maxime Coquelin , Baruch Siach , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Javier Martinez Canillas Le 20/05/2015 02:27, Stephen Rothwell a =E9crit : > Hi Kukjin, >=20 > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig between various commits from the > arm-soc and at91 trees and various commits from the samsung tree. >=20 > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no acti= on > is required). AT91 part seems okay. Thanks, --=20 Nicolas Ferre