From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (lightnvm) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:37:11 -0700 Message-ID: <56378327.4020500@fb.com> References: <20151102035340.17310681@canb.auug.org.au> <5636B979.9010507@infradead.org> <56375A8B.9090006@bjorling.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com ([67.231.145.42]:8215 "EHLO mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753160AbbKBPhp (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:37:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56375A8B.9090006@bjorling.me> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Matias Bjorling Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/02/2015 05:43 AM, Matias Bjorling wrote: > On 11/02/2015 02:16 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-) >>> >>> Changes since 20151022: >>> >> >> on i386: >> >> ../include/linux/lightnvm.h:143:4: error: width of 'resved' exceeds its type >> >> # CONFIG_LBDAF is not set >> >> > > Thanks Randy. > > Jens, how would you like to receive the patch? (I've currently attached > it in this mail) If it really needs to be 64-bit regardless of LBDAF, just make it a u64 instead of typedef'ing some new ppa_t that everybody would have to look up. -- Jens Axboe