From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfsd tree
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:38:31 +0200
Message-ID: <568D4307.1010405@mellanox.com>
References: <20151231133022.0b3ecab9@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20160104124450.7ba21c87@canb.auug.org.au> <5689DEA0.1020803@redhat.com>
 <20160104193616.GB30315@fieldses.org>
 <24AC8112-95A2-4D7B-8048-3D7D50A78B90@oracle.com>
 <20160106121529.GA21780@lst.de>
 <90E07B04-AAFD-45E9-85EA-44C659191180@oracle.com>
 <568D28D2.4090507@mellanox.com>
 <3B1D726B-5225-40D5-8C94-CA87EF198D89@oracle.com>
 <568D3838.7010606@mellanox.com>
 <2118F38A-846F-4690-A6E8-0BA7A437D567@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-db3on0084.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.84]:53014
	"EHLO emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751582AbcAFRNm (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:13:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: <2118F38A-846F-4690-A6E8-0BA7A437D567@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>

On 1/6/2016 6:33 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Anna was the only NFS maintainer listed, and linux-nfs was not included on that e-mail at all.

OK, will do better next time.

> Did Anna ever reply with an Acked-by ? I don't see that in either the archive or my own inbox.

as you wrote, the patch is mechanical, I didn't think there's a deep 
need to desperately chase people for that ack

Or.