From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvms390 tree with the s390 tree
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:45:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575FC43C.7000306@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614145117.54eba7ec@canb.auug.org.au>
On 06/14/2016 06:51 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvms390 tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/s390/hypfs/hypfs_diag.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 6c22c9863760 ("s390: avoid extable collisions")
>
> from the s390 tree and commit:
>
> e65f30e0cb29 ("s390: hypfs: Move diag implementation and data definitions")
>
> from the kvms390 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (using the kvms390 version and then adding the following
> patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
> mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:47:33 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] s390: merge fix up for __diag204 move
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/diag.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/diag.c b/arch/s390/kernel/diag.c
> index a44faf4a0454..2289d6f8bec0 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/diag.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/diag.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static inline int __diag204(unsigned long subcode, unsigned long size, void *add
>
> asm volatile(
> " diag %2,%0,0x204\n"
> - "0:\n"
> + "0: nopr %%r7\n"
> EX_TABLE(0b,0b)
> : "+d" (_subcode), "+d" (_size) : "d" (addr) : "memory");
> if (_subcode)
>
Yes, thanks. This conflict (and the other preexisting one) will move soon to Paolos KVM tree
as I plan to submit my first pull request soon.
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 4:51 linux-next: manual merge of the kvms390 tree with the s390 tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-14 4:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-14 8:45 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-23 1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-23 7:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-01-23 19:02 ` Anthony Krowiak
2023-01-24 11:19 ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-01-24 14:43 ` Anthony Krowiak
2022-11-08 2:41 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-22 2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-03 1:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-27 3:29 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-27 6:47 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-11-23 3:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-23 8:24 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-11-23 9:17 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-07-22 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575FC43C.7000306@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).