From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:42:54 +0200
Message-ID: <575d1d5a-5cfb-49b4-0ce7-b78372739cb6@redhat.com>
References: <20170825143930.494744fe@canb.auug.org.au>
 <2984689e-ab4e-0c22-7151-adfeeffce4ed@redhat.com>
 <dd8be323-8ffb-bab5-0431-f77e48fd5df1@amd.com>
 <a71c9dbd-ec32-8bb6-9d36-c138d9b4f001@amd.com>
 <2b021bf3-9ace-8678-0793-c0048500469c@redhat.com>
 <df4641f2-93ca-4923-bb6b-5a43f709859c@amd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40908 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1755255AbdHYUm7 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:42:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <df4641f2-93ca-4923-bb6b-5a43f709859c@amd.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>, paolo.bonzini@gmail.com

On 25/08/2017 22:41, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>>>
> 
>> Neither my version nor yours is correct. :)  The right one has [0][i]
>> and [1][i] (I inverted the indices by mistake).
>>
>> With that change, you can include my
>>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> I assuming that this patch should be sent through the tip since SME support
> came from tip. I will be submitting the patch very soon.

Yes, that is correct.  I cannot apply it directly to the KVM tree.

Paolo