linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>,
	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:43:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57E4EB25.2020206@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160923133116.707a8f07@canb.auug.org.au>

On 23/09/16 04:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the kvm-arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> tmp/cc9rCfjd.s: Assembler messages:
> tmp/cc9rCfjd.s:310: Error: bad or missing co-processor number -- `mcr "mrc","mcr","p15, 0, r2, c12, c12, 3",u32'
> scripts/Makefile.build:290: recipe for target 'drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.o' failed
> 
> Maybe caused by commit
> 
>   4f2546384150 ("ARM: Move system register accessors to asm/cp15.h")
> 
> I have used the kvm-arm tree from next-20160922 for today.

Ouch. This comes from 91ef844 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Reset BPR during
initialization") which has introduced a new accessor that doesn't get
converted by Vladimir's patch. My own fault.

This can be fixed-up by adding this to Vladimir's patch:

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
index 996848e..809f3be 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
@@ -216,6 +216,15 @@ static inline void gic_write_sre(u32 val)
 	isb();
 }
 
+static inline void gic_write_bpr1(u32 val)
+{
+#ifndef __write_sysreg
+	asm volatile("mcr " __stringify(ICC_BPR1) : : "r" (val));
+#else
+	write_sysreg(val, ICC_BPR1);
+#endif
+}
+
 /*
  * Even in 32bit systems that use LPAE, there is no guarantee that the I/O
  * interface provides true 64bit atomic accesses, so using strd/ldrd doesn't

but that'll create a minor conflict.

Another possibility is to put Vladimir's series on the backburner until
tip/irq/core gets in, and bring it back at this time. I'd prefer the
first solution, as it gives a bit more exposure to the code...

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-23  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-23  3:31 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-23  8:43 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-23 15:28 Mark Brown
2025-09-23 16:02 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-23 16:44   ` Will Deacon
2025-09-24  2:37     ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-09-24  7:45       ` Will Deacon
2025-07-29  4:22 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-29 18:05 ` Oliver Upton
2025-03-20  9:32 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-20 13:35 ` Oliver Upton
2025-03-06  5:46 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-06  9:56 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2025-03-07  0:00   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-07  0:51     ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-22 11:03 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-22 11:11 ` Joey Gouly
2024-02-22 11:40   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-22 13:11     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-22 13:11     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-22 14:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-22 18:58         ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-05  1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-05  1:53 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-05 10:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-05 10:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-05 11:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2014-09-22  4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-22  5:07 ` Eric Auger
2014-09-22  5:31   ` Eric Auger
     [not found] ` <CAEDV+g+qVgG+=1Q7gBCPs8oAjK8rpzpoQ2cPMF0hi5Q1M3Nckw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-22 21:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-24  6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-24  7:06   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-24 10:05     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57E4EB25.2020206@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=cdall@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).