From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:15:42 -0400 Message-ID: <57EAA93E.10106@redhat.com> References: <20160927112334.3615159e@canb.auug.org.au> <20160927050415.GA2024@lst.de> <20160927154820.11d17334@canb.auug.org.au> <20160927133949.GA21231@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jwvQivGvojhPFGdNvimsKJEknXAb3HO8C" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43556 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbcI0RPp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:15:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160927133949.GA21231@lst.de> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig , Stephen Rothwell Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jwvQivGvojhPFGdNvimsKJEknXAb3HO8C Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gfbD3BXMnGnXTAxBbKK0WcUTrgH9Qsx5g" From: Doug Ledford To: Christoph Hellwig , Stephen Rothwell Cc: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <57EAA93E.10106@redhat.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree References: <20160927112334.3615159e@canb.auug.org.au> <20160927050415.GA2024@lst.de> <20160927154820.11d17334@canb.auug.org.au> <20160927133949.GA21231@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20160927133949.GA21231@lst.de> --gfbD3BXMnGnXTAxBbKK0WcUTrgH9Qsx5g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/27/16 9:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 03:48:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Yeah, sorry. Note, however, that you bothered to fix up this same >> staging file in another of your patches ... >=20 > It's generally not that I don't fix them up because I hate them, it's > just because they are doing something so incredibly stupid that it woul= d > take forever to fix up (and something that would have been could if it > ever had been through review). For this particular case I think every= one > would be served much better if this module was simply dropped from the > tree, as there will be lots of future patches that will break it. >=20 I don't know that I would drop them, but certainly turn them off. They can keep their driver up to date. --=20 Doug Ledford GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD Red Hat, Inc. 100 E. Davie St Raleigh, NC 27601 USA --gfbD3BXMnGnXTAxBbKK0WcUTrgH9Qsx5g-- --jwvQivGvojhPFGdNvimsKJEknXAb3HO8C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJX6qk+AAoJELgmozMOVy/db3AP/iRVvfm4odXvTEvUonVZwqZn MwdpNL7cHG30+Inizm1tblTgX9oqqZXV0FL31BQy6zPj7Xsks1YapHpTslNOGqfM TREb7+L0Z08zDq6frEgnV/RnzBBrYpaSZe1v8BIf6Tpqov7NWjEfoh6dLHDmtLBF szygcalC9e/iuUnOaisHEuk3ap1Jd3O5w6Hsr+L8Q21YghAi1j96hKdmPwc4/JnL akNvH77R2y8A1pq2lrbU7P/hwKJbcmZ024+3gdompG4R54mtHkaskf5PQDhTBX8R PWKHY48CenC2h8hIkN90qf29K5cAGn46xcdWS65sWrLxCVtjd+j14Xe/uEeeuBzL dSyRfElYbSn3yKXnFZ+IM51aPbq2uhEjNzf6MuRnUDp8TQ97MtuI5VDkVx5ouIeL ljY+jQncp0qDa/k+UAxCHtdzOXlr9LMo2Qirifhs6A+9Th7E2j05SbQ8lflVLrV5 +uNzKj50uEopNYQze36Nd3MaFO7Ne4C2Se7GjeSUxaTVIUtVjSWfY3uDV9zastip lhh3x4XhpKtGCbMYo/ran04IOvQjbQMRWrvP/n6IAZ9eKGTmK2HY0o+xMYtjyXd4 Dn2+y6DjAoi0xAQUSma/Bk/KhskhqvD9LYOljHLbc7RWfTjil50ygHcWtsg//NTE OTIfxVxIWzW/912hmrh+ =Xsho -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jwvQivGvojhPFGdNvimsKJEknXAb3HO8C--