From: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 17:07:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68b54a90-b87c-4b74-a24d-0faaf0f76e2d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250501135827.214fac1f@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi,
On 5/1/2025 5:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>
> between commit:
>
> ac4e04d9e378 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Unchecked MSR aceess in legacy mode")
This one has been merged into 6.15-rc5.
> from the pm tree and commit:
>
> c435e608cf59 ("x86/msr: Rename 'rdmsrl()' to 'rdmsrq()'")
So this one will clash with the mainline now.
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks for the report!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 3:58 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-06 15:07 ` Wysocki, Rafael J [this message]
2025-05-06 17:43 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-16 6:15 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-16 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-16 9:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-16 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-28 3:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-12 4:55 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-12 5:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-12 20:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-05-15 15:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 15:50 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-05-28 3:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-28 14:14 ` Limonciello, Mario
2025-05-28 22:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-17 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-17 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-07-02 4:15 Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-02 9:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-07-17 1:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-17 2:33 ` srinivas pandruvada
2024-07-17 9:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-06-24 17:06 Mark Brown
2024-06-25 3:00 ` Xiaojian Du
2024-06-25 4:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-06-25 4:51 ` Xiaojian Du
2021-02-17 5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-17 10:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-22 0:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-08 2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-08 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-08 10:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-10-08 2:40 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-08 10:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-10-08 10:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-03-23 2:20 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-23 6:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-03-23 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-24 8:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-06 2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-06 13:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-08-11 4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 4:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-22 5:48 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-09 4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-19 2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-15 1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-11 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-11 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-29 4:42 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-06 3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-31 7:58 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-31 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-31 7:10 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-15 2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-25 5:46 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-25 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-08-04 6:55 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-09 4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-13 3:29 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-07 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-06 7:18 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-19 4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-11 4:08 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68b54a90-b87c-4b74-a24d-0faaf0f76e2d@intel.com \
--to=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).