From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392D9C433DB for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0436B64E89 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229782AbhBLQ3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:29:24 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34938 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230353AbhBLQ1Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:27:16 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D4BC061786 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:26:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id m20so8630309ilj.13 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:26:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wWYQggmidDOXt8SlEpUZeJHp/q9QIYaBxVftGHC9fl4=; b=wqK20CJrDipWCz9QUtF7I6iO/4sqOeVO4U9r0p+G2dg+YwXUcEaQOw/vfYef9zebwY tseAfC4F9wICBg3NN8s+WDl1D9LUAkCp3cqLS+JmkIhnhXy6tAInE8eUu0wZjDfdvRsf Izj928y0tSJPXIBy+FAZmJPHOn2SrTTafRHRXl0fnpaUW8rAxSOIubeD7jPnr3glJWsi +xgH6NENxsyA/mR0TxfoG2/CT7KG8dgUQblOwXJ/byahzdJdvtXcGSNym3TVoUzth5IY hqelihDyrtMw9gqPiCDK24udHz7NuN2AMH5Yd1CYZMItGOB9bNecmcCXFbOsxxIByitx b5Qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wWYQggmidDOXt8SlEpUZeJHp/q9QIYaBxVftGHC9fl4=; b=He2qSiVyLH3D8vx5Uyiqtb/DiXdJzqkWxsre4veHjAw4pSJiBW98YyAzD+S0yYA3Dv EAznpAYrEMgFgArHEv9x+wpck+sr88xudNqiermQ99zmk1sh524o8DGswYQeHRbfvlT9 DNm3fKT1MXh139lhW1JEn1UqbziHW5FNvSoSMsRAq5PIbBekIWWOh69DgmN4lG9vncPq jGOyrS+1OZ/WE3/j3r4tiDmuO85tJBRSUqnEnG7KQP9vhaNrCM3IDFdhnY1UuIPPVdlW v0yeOqy3NHKczfjsx596kjUnT3o/HnbN3gsV2dry2Uw6EcDtV6Ha5vEDOIMSRyYKibcS o4/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PIeQoBG4r6RFE8pTnQX526kAvexNBfI3tFPTka0/hIfWi/M3N z8/SaVOwuF39D2bah6+34sEeRjmh9akdSSP3 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqKK70rITdwxOkp1Fp0AxwB0gmZns9uk9e8ElQcdo6PA7zYv9EhYMyqsn7CTpZc1rPJ20/4g== X-Received: by 2002:a92:ad09:: with SMTP id w9mr2869509ilh.23.1613147189266; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:26:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5sm2013784ilo.42.2021.02.12.08.26.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 08:26:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the block tree To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Frederic Weisbecker , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List References: <20210211164852.7489b87d@canb.auug.org.au> <20210211173802.GM2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <793e83ff-3bd1-39a0-9037-cb3cbfb455e8@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:26:28 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 2/12/21 9:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:26:56AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> But I think I made a mistake in that it should've been sched/smp instead, >> which would likely get rid of this issue too? I'll rebase it, it's just >> a single topic branch with just those two patches on top. > > Right, I made tip/sched/smp with just that one patch. That _should_ work > for you, if not, please let me know. It does, I just originally fat fingered the pull. All fixed up now! -- Jens Axboe