From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "stephane eranian" Subject: Re: linux-next: concerns over the perfmon3 tree Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:27:11 +0100 Message-ID: <7c86c4470811260527v66005ef9tda0010a62b1dc632@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081126213449.ab269449.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: eranian@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.187]:40209 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752028AbYKZN1N (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:27:13 -0500 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so420845fkq.5 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:27:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20081126213449.ab269449.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" Stephen On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Stephane, > > Given the concerns expressed by Ingo, I have dropped the perfmon3 tree > from linux-next until they have been addressed. Hopefully that will not > be loo long. Let us all know how we can help with this. > Thanks for your help. I am fine going through the review process once again. I am just hoping we can still make the 2.6.29 target.